Gabriel Schenekenberg vs Janis Graski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schenekenberg vs Graski analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriel Schenekenberg vs Janis Graski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Schenekenberg 1 - 0 Graski
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schenekenberg has won 44.44% of points on their second serve, while Graski has won 30%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schenekenberg, in recent form, has won 46.32% of their opponent's second serve points, while Graski has won 42.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.1% and 20% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schenekenberg has saved 45.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Graski has saved 37.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schenekenberg has won 41.38% of matches played (W/L 12/ 17), with Graski winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schenekenberg has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 24/ 30), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8). Graski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Schenekenberg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.38% of matches (W/L 12/ 17), where as Graski has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 30% of matches (W/L 3/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schenekenberg winning 1 times and Graski being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schenekenberg winning 2 and Graski winning 0. The last match between Schenekenberg and Graski was at the M15 Antalya, 07-04-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Gabriel Schenekenberg getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schenekenberg and Graski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schenekenberg winning 0 times and Graski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schenekenberg winning 0, and Graski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schenekenberg has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Graski has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schenekenberg has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Graski has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schenekenberg has converted 53.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Graski has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Gabriel Schenekenberg
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
Janis Graski
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
42% (27-38)
Career Total W/L
33% (4-8)
27% (3-8)
YTD W/L
20% (1-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Schenekenberg VS Graski H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Gabriel Schenekenberg | Janis Graski |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Schenekenberg VS Graski H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Gabriel Schenekenberg | Janis Graski |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 27% (3/8) | 20% (1/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 29% (7/17) | 31% (4/9) |
Games Win/Loss | 42% (92/127) | 40% (53/80) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 20% (1/4) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.01 | 0 |
Aces Total | 1 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.07 | 0 |
DFs Total | 7 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (88/160) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 53% (47/88) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (34/72) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 33% (50/150) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 27% (3/8) | 20% (1/4) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (3/11) | 20% (1/5) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 33% (1/3) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Gabriel Schenekenberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Luca Hesselmann
Player
Gabriel Schenekenberg
35%
(
18 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
61
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Gabriel Schenekenberg
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Gabriel Schenekenberg
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Janis Graski Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 1-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Mert Alkaya
Player
Janis Graski
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 2-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H |
view more